Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Prosecuting Attorney v. Webster

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1933No. 209PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

On September 13, 1932, the then prosecuting attorney, as relator, commenced an action in quo warranto in this court to oust the defendant Webster from “the office of prosecuting attorney or of special prosecuting! attorney or of assistant prosecuting attorney,” it being claimed that Webster acting as such officer by appointment of the then judge of the Court of Common Pleas is prosecuting certain criminal actions based on indictments returned by the Grand Jury and is thereby usurping the authority, power and duties of relator who, at the commencement of this action, was the duly elected,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Williams v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Paluf v. FeneliOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API