Legal Opinion

Brown v. Leek

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1933No. 7 Div. 978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIGE, Judge.

“The trial was had for conversion of timber and trespass in taking timber.” This is the second appeal. The first, transferred to the Supreme Court, under the statute (Code 1923-, § 7326), presented the questions which may be called essential to a correct disposition of the litigation. In effect, at least, they were decided against appellant’s contentions. The report of the decision on that appeal, 221 Ala. 319, 128 So. 608, contains ample discussion, or narration, of the issues involved. To it the reader is referred, Code 1923, § 7318.

The pleadings and, substantially, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commercial Inv. Trust, Inc. v. EastSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Brown v. LeekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Williams v. Alabama Fuel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Bank of Ramer v. DerdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McLaney v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. Brown v. LeekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API