Legal Opinion

Musser v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 1985No. C14-84-236CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JUNELL, Justice.

This appeal concerns a defamation action brought by Bob Musser, appellant, against Andrew Smith, appellee. A jury answering special issues found that a certain written statement made by Smith in a letter was libelous and made with malice and was a proximate cause of damage to Musser. The jury awarded actual or compensatory damages of $15,000 and exemplary damages of $35,000. Upon appellee’s motion for a judgment non obstante veredicto the trial court disregarded the jury’s finding as to malice and exemplary damages and judgment was entered that Musser recover only…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hajek v. Bill Mowbray Motors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Arant v. JaffeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Gartman v. HedgpethTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Taylor v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Hajek v. Bill Mowbray Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Musser v. Smith Protective Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. George Farias v. Bexar County Board of Trustees for Mental Health Mental Retardation ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. Provencio v. Paradigm Media, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2001
  4. UTV of San Antonio, Inc. v. Ardmore, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  5. Hancock v. Variyam, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API