DeRolph v. State

For the reasons discussed in my dissenting opinion of August 21, 1998 to DeRolph v. State (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 1208, 699 *1213N.E.2d 516,1 respectfully dissent from today’s decision to assign to the state the burden of proving that its new legislation is constitutional.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., concur in the foregoing opinion.