State Ex Rel. Baker v. Strange
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The only question in this case is whether Joel Baker and Bonnie Baker (the Bakers) were foreclosed from the remedy of mandamus because they had an adequate remedy at law in the form of judicial review of the decision of Larry Strange (Strange), the Building Inspector for the City of Green River. The district court denied the Bakers’ Petition for a Writ of Mandamus on the ground that they did have an adequate remedy at law. The Bakers contended that judicial review was not an adequate remedy because the ten day period for seeking judicial review under the ordinance of the City…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vandehei Developers v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Hermreck v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- K N Energy, Inc. v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Harbel v. WintermuteWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- LeBeau v. State Ex Rel. WhiteWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bonnie M. Quinn Revocable Trust v. SRW, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- L. Michael Sorensen and Sheri M. Sorensen, Individually and as Trustees of the Sheri M. Sorensen Living Trust Dated May 15, 2012; Jennifer Anne Twiss and Scott James Twiss v. Sean Halling and Melissa Halling; the Town of Afton, a Wyoming Municipal Corporation; and the Governing Body of the Town of AftonWyoming Supreme Court · 2025
- Ahearn v. Town of WheatlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Clare Sikora v. City of RawlinsWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Schanzenbach v. Town of La Barge, WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.