Browning v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
From a conviction in the district court of Oklahoma county upon a charge of burglary in the second degree, the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, has appealed.
Only 'two assignments of error are argued in the brief of defendant. First: That the court erred in overruling defendant’s motion to quash the information; second, insufficiency of the evidence. Upon the first assignment, it is argued that there was no showing made that the defendant had a preliminary examination. An examination of the case-made discloses that the motion to quash was not filed until long after plea…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blair v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
- Gunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- McLaughlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ex Parte OwenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
- Ex Parte RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
- Evinger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
- Orum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.