Legal Opinion

In re Doe

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 9, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, A. J. S. C.

This is an application for pre-indictment discovery of wiretapped telephone conversations pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-16 that provides in pertinent part:

The court, upon filing of a motion, may in its discretion make available to such persons or their attorneys for inspection such portions of the intercepted communications, applications and orders as the court determines to be in the interest of justice.

John Doe (not the applicant’s real name) has received an inventory dated December 24, 1981, pursuant to the same statute, advising him and other identified persons that:

a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BraeunigNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  2. Howard Savings Institution v. FrancisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  3. State v. PolitoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. State v. MurphyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API