Legal Opinion

Strick v. Pierce

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 11, 1985No. 84 C 4093PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ROVNER, District Judge.

The motion of the defendant, Samuel Pierce, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Jack Strick is granted because the complaint is barred by plaintiffs failure to submit a sworn proof of loss within the requisite period of time and because the plaintiff has failed to document adequately the amount of his loss. No material dispute exists between the parties as to the facts.

Plaintiffs shoe store was burglarized on September 15, 1982, at which time he was covered by a policy issued…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Meister Bros., Inc. v. John W. MacY Jr., Director of Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Cross Queen, Inc. v. Director, Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1980
  4. Victoria Camera, Inc. v. GuiffridaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  5. Wiesel v. GuiffridaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bullard v. ConnorDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API