Legal Opinion

Diliberti v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant established its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by producing the 911 recording and Sprint report, revealing a 30-second call that did not include any assurance by the operator that help was on its way, or any direction to the infant caller that she should not do anything, before the call was broken off (see Doe v Town of Hempstead Bd. of Educ., 18 AD3d 600 [2005]). This shifted the burden to plaintiffs who, even after granting them all favorable inferences, failed to establish an assumption by the municipality, through promises or actions, of an affirmative duty to act…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Diaz v. New York Downtown HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Laratro v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Doe v. Town of Hempstead Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore-Mohammed v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Clark v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Clark v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Moore-Mohammed v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API