Diliberti v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant established its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by producing the 911 recording and Sprint report, revealing a 30-second call that did not include any assurance by the operator that help was on its way, or any direction to the infant caller that she should not do anything, before the call was broken off (see Doe v Town of Hempstead Bd. of Educ., 18 AD3d 600 [2005]). This shifted the burden to plaintiffs who, even after granting them all favorable inferences, failed to establish an assumption by the municipality, through promises or actions, of an affirmative duty to act…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Diaz v. New York Downtown HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Laratro v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Doe v. Town of Hempstead Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moore-Mohammed v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Clark v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Clark v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Moore-Mohammed v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012