Legal Opinion
Hamrick v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 14, 1990No. A90A1081PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Judge.
Defendant appeals his convictions of habitual violator, OCGA § 40-5-58 (c), driving under the influence of alcohol, OCGA § 40-6-391, and fleeing and attempting to elude the police, OCGA § 40-6-395. He contends the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions, his motion to suppress should have been granted, and his sentence was illegal because it was vindictive.
1. Prior to trial, defendant moved to suppress items of personal property seized within the curtilage of his home plus testimony as to the results of a chemical test to determine the amount of alcohol in his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Threatt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Darby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- State v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.