Legal Opinion

Schofer v. Hoffman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 4, 1943No. [No. 15, October Term, 1943.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, C. J.

This case is in trover brought by Haimen Schofer, trading as H. Schofer & Sons, against Hugo R. Hoffman and Burton P. Hoffman, his wife, for the conversion by the defendants of an oil heater and water tank which had been installed in the property occupied by them situate in Baltimore County. It was tried before the court sitting as a jury (Rule 9, Part III, Trials by the Court), and from a judgment for the defendants plaintiff appeals. The record shows that replevin would have been the proper form of action, but it was agreed to have the case tried on the' merits, the result to be either a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dudley & Carpenter v. Hurst, Miller & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  2. Homeseekers' Realty Co. v. Silent Automatic Sales Corp. Ex Rel. Timken Silent Automatic Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  3. Abramson v. PennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  4. Heating & Plumbing Finance Corp. v. Glyndon Permanent Building Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Supervisor of Assessments v. Hartge Yacht Yard, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. State Department of Assessments and TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Droney v. DroneyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Fulford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Dermer v. FaunceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API