Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Hanrahan v. McAdoo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1905Published

Appeal from an order of the Kings County Special Terin, entered in the. office of the clerk of said county on the 26th day of January; 1905, denying a motion ■ for a peremptory writ of mandamus.

1Per curiam

We think that the relator has mistaken his remedy. If, as the record shows, he was convicted after a- trial upon charges, he cannot in effect review that determination and annul it by mandamus, but he must resort to certiorari. (People ex rel. Goodwin v. MacLean, 62 Hun, 42.) This rule is not . affected by the number or the gravity of the errors which may be assigned to the trial and the procedure thereof, so long as it appears that the' dismissal complained of was the result of a judicial act. The relator cannot, by allegation that his suspension pending the-charges and their determination…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Goodwin v. MacLeanNew York Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API