Hayes v. Arch
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
Nearly ten years after the original petition for partition was filed in this case two of the defendants, who are defendants in error here, recovered a money judgment against James W. Hayes, plaintiff in error here, on the theory that Hayes was liable to them for the difference between what they received from a sale of the property involved and what they would have received had Hayes complied with his election to take at the first appraised value. The proceedings are involved, but a statement of the progress of the litigation is desirable.
Hayes and one J. A. Brown brought the partition…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Blakeley's Admx v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Cowper v. Weaver's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clement v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955