Devasil v. Diakovasilis
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
1Opinion of the Court
Braham, P. J.,
— In this action for
divorce an appearance, an answer on the merits, and a petition for alimony pendente lite and for counsel fees have been filed on behalf of defendant. Plaintiff has countered by entering a rule upon the attorneys who *256have appeared for defendant to file their warrant of attorney as is provided by the Act of April 14, 1834, P. L. 333, sec. 71, 17 PS §1632. To this Robert M. White and Elmer D. O’Neil, the attorneys appearing for defendant, reply by narrating the manner of their employment. The case was placed upon the argument list and argued without the taking…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca Di NavigazioneSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- The Kaiser Wilhelm IICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Bonomo v. BonomoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Hall v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.