Legal Opinion

Sinclair v. Stringer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1921No. 9917PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; H. L. Standeven, Trial Judge. Action by Martha J. Stringer against Earl W. Sinclair, administrator of the estate of Fred D. Zeigler, deceased. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Per curiam

This was an action commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, for the recovery of money alleged to be due the plaintiff for services rendered as a practical nurse to the family of Fred G. Zeigler under a contract, either express or implied, entered into with Mr. Zeigler during his lifetime. Upon trial to a jury there was a verdict for the plaintiff for the amount prayed for, upon which judgment was duly entered, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.

Originally the plaintiff’s petition contained two causes of action,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ah How v. FurthWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Belden v. ScottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Foggette v. GaffneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pancoast v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Miller v. NannySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Hutchings v. WinsorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Leonard v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Hartsell v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API