Legal Opinion

Mozingo v. City of Dothan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 14, 1992No. 1910546PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

The question presented in this case is whether, in a prosecution under Ala.Code 1975, § 32-6-19, for driving with a canceled, revoked, or suspended driver’s license, “the prosecution must allege and prove the specific alternative by which the defendant’s license or privilege to drive was terminated,” as the Court of Criminal Appeals held. Mozingo v. City of Dothan, 603 So.2d 1119 (Ala.Cr.App.1991). We affirm that holding, but we also attempt to answer some of the arguments made by the City of Dothan concerning the effect of that holding upon law enforcement officers charged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. House v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Brown v. City of MontgomeryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  4. Norton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Mozingo v. City of DothanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API