Legal Opinion

Karchman v. Karchman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1928Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the judgment was recovered on default in an action brought to recover a sum of money only; no warrant of attachment was “ granted in the action ” and no service of the summons was made on defendant except by publication. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 232; Dimmerling v. Andrews, 236 N. Y. 43, 46.) Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur. [131 Misc. 462.]

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dimmerling v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Karchman v. KarchmanNew York Supreme Court · 1928