Legal Opinion

Comer v. Granniss

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 1, 1885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Fraud. Vendor and Purchaser. Value. Equity. Laches. Contracts. Before Judge Simmons. Bibb Superior Court. April Term, 1885. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the CourtBlandrord, Justice

When this case was before this court, as reported in 55 Ga., 147, this court held that the allegations in the bill made such a prima faoie case of fraud as required the overruling a demurrer thereto. The bill alleged that Granniss fraudulently concealed from Hanson, the agent of the plaintiff, the real value of the stock, knowing that Hanson was ignorant thereof; also that Hanson reposed special trust and confidence in Granniss. These are the main allegations in the bill as to fraud. The facts are, that Mr. Oomer, who lived in Savannah, and who was well acquainted with the value of the stock…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Granniss v. Bates & ComerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. GortatowskySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Hill v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Cole v. Hunter Tract Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Alsabrook v. Continental Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API