Legal Opinion

Malloy v. Morrin

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 24, 2025No. 1:23-cv-02234Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION QUINLAN MALLOY, Plaintiff, No. 23 CV 2234 v. Judge Georgia N. Alexakis CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER DANIEL MORRIN, ET AL., Defendants. ORDER For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants defendants’ motion to strike plaintiff’s amended complaint. [27]. Plaintiff’s amended complaint [24] is stricken. Defendants’ motions to dismiss [26] [28] are denied as moot. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint on or before March 18, 2025. STATEMENT Plaintiff Quinlan Malloy’s amended complaint concerns…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vicom, Inc. v. Harbridge Merchant Services, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Peach Tree Bancard Corporation, Judy Elliot, James ElliotCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Delta Consulting Group, Inc. v. R. Randle Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Heller Financial, Inc. v. Midwhey Powder Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Volling v. Antioch Rescue SquadDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  5. Siegel v. HSBC Holdings, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API