Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 25, 2001No. 14-99-00426-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED OPINION

YATES, Justice.

William Steed Kelley, Jerome A. Marks, Thomas E. Morbach, and Joseph A. Richard, appellants, appeal from an order dismissing their pro se, in forma pauperis suit. On our own motion, we withdraw the opinion issued November 30, 2000, and issue this corrected opinion affirming in part and reversing and remanding in part.

Appellants are inmates in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division (“TDCJ-ID”). Appellants filed suit against appellees alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and their constitutional rights. Their claims were based on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. Ruiz v. EstelleDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1980
  4. Daryl Gillespie v. Bobby CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  5. William Johnson, Jr. v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kelly, William Steed v. Scott, Wayne, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API