Legal Opinion

Svestka v. Pell

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1966No. 3927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MYERS, Associate Judge:

Appellee Pell, a real estate broker, sued appellants, husband and wife, upon a promissory note for $5,000 executed by them to cover the balance of a brokerage fee due him as a result of procuring buyers for two apartment houses. Appellee had previously been paid $15,000 in part payment of his total commission. After a full hearing, at which all parties presented certain relevant documents, including listing agreements, contracts of sale and settlement sheets, as well as oral testimony concerning the negotiations and ultimate sale of the properties, the trial judge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Green v. ObergfellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Wm. P. Lipscomb Co. v. Kaldenbach & Wysong, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Svestka v. PellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kass v. William Norwitz Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1980
  2. In Re Estate of McCaggDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Cohen v. CohenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Remco Business Systems, Inc. v. HollowellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Johnston v. Industrial National BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API