Legal Opinion · Dissent

MICHIGAN Ex Rel WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTOR v. BENNIS

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1994No. 97339, (Calendar No. 5)Published

1DissentCavanagh, C.J.

As Mr. Rogers would say, "It’s a wonderful day in the neighborhood.” In this public nuisance abatement case, the focus should be clear: Was the defendants’ vehicle an abatable public nuisance? I cannot agree with the lead opinion’s mystical concept that under the statute we can call the condition of an entire neighborhood a public nuisance. Nor can I agree with its invention that any vehicle contributing to this condition can be abated.

I remain unconvinced that the conduct at issue in the instant case comes within the scope of the public nuisance abatement statute. Assuming arguendo that it…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Arcara v. Cloud Books, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. People ex rel. Arcara v. Cloud Books, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API