Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Donaldson

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1898No. Sac. No. 468PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County and from an order denying a new trial. A. P. Catiin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Respondent, owning a certain tract of land, leased it to defendant William Donaldson for a share of the *9crop as rent, to be delivered in the sack to her. He also gave her a chattel mortgage upon all his interest in the growing crop to secure a then existing indebtedness. William Donaldson hired appellant C. L. Donaldson to harvest the crop at an agreed price of one dollar per acre. The grain was harvested under this contract, and upon the completion of the work this appellant took possession of two hundred and fifty sacks of the grain, claiming a lien thereon to the extent of his contract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Case v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  2. Storms v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Hanch v. RipleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Campbell v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Ingalls v. VanceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1889

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Parker-Harris Co. v. TateTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. American Type Founders Co. v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. American Type Founders' Co. v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Mortgage Securities Co. v. PfaffmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Atlas Securities Co. v. GroveIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API