South Atlantic Steamship Line v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*711OPINION.
Van Fossan:
The first issue for our determination is whether or not new preferred stock of the Fertilizer Co. received by petitioner in accordance with a recapitalization of that company was a dividend taxable to petitioner under section 115 of the Eevenue Act of 1936. Petitioner contends that the change in capital structure of the Fertilizer Co. constituted a reorganization and gain is recognizable on the exchange of the old stock for new stock, bonds, and cash only to *712the extent of the cash received. Respondent argues, however, that the noncumulative preferred stock was received by…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Southern Fertilizer & Chemical Co. v. EdwardsDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1955
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Carman. Carman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Penfield v. DavisDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1952
- Appleman v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Fisher v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.