Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barbara Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Company, Farrar Oilfield Service and Equipment Co., and Tri-State Oil Services, Inc., Tri-State Oil Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 29, 1995No. 94-60444Published

1DissentDeMOSS, Circuit Judge

There is much in the majority opinion with which I agree, but there is more with which I disagree, particularly the ultimate conclusions of the majority regarding removability. I write therefore to register my dissent.

I agree with the majority that the beginning point in determining the propriety of removal of a case from state court to federal court is to look at the “face of the complaint” in state court and apply the “facially apparent” test. Looking at the amended complaint last filed in state court before the notice of removal, I conclude that the complaint was on its face not removable…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. De Aguilar v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. Charlie Gaitor v. Peninsular & Occidental Steamship Company, Blue Steamship Company, and Shaw Brothers Shipping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. C & C TRUCKING CO. v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Lailhengue v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API