Legal Opinion

Miller v. Legacy Bank

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 2023No. 5:20-cv-00946Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MARQUISE MILLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-20-946-D ) LEGACY BANK, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Legacy Bank’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees [Doc. No. 194]. Plaintiff Marquise Miller filed objections [Doc. No. 255], to which Defendant replied [Doc. No. 260]. The matter is fully briefed and at issue. Background On April 7, 2023, the Court denied two motions to compel filed by Plaintiff. See 4/7/2023 Order [Doc. No. 183]. In so doing, the Court, pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 37(a)(5)(B),…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  5. Case v. Unified School District No. 233Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API