Legal Opinion · Dissent

Washington v. Louisiana-I Gaming

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 2014No. Nos. 14-CA-467, 14-CA-468Published

1DissentJohnson, J.

lil, respectfully, dissent from the majority opinion on the issue of Letress Washington’s entitlement to supplement earnings benefits (“SEBs”). After considering the record for this case in its entirety, I conclude the majority opinion failed to apply the appellate review standard properly for that assignment of error.

In this matter, Ms. Washington had retired at the age of 62 in 2010. After being bored with- retirement, Ms. Washington applied for 'a position with Louisiana A-I Gaming (hereinafter referred to as “Boom-town”) and was hired as a cook on March 23, 2013. On May 6, 2013, Ms.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Poissenot v. St. Bernard Parish Sheriff's OfficeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  2. Wilson v. Metropolitan Development CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Tynes v. Gaylord Container Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Whetstone v. Jefferson Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API