Legal Opinion
Coleman v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided August 11, 1988No. 16767Published
1Opinion of the Court
762 P.2d 814 (1988)
114 Idaho 901
Andrew B. COLEMAN, Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
STATE of Idaho, Respondent-Appellant.
No. 16767.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
August 11, 1988.
Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., and Timothy D. Wilson, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for respondent-appellant. Timothy D. Wilson argued.
Uranga & Uranga, Boise, for petitioner-respondent. Christopher M. Bieter argued.
BISTLINE, Justice.
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether a prison policy which prohibits an inmate's access to the law library passes constitutional muster. The district judge held that a ten-day restriction on access to a…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.