Legal Opinion

United States Steel Corporation, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Appellee-Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 12, 1980No. 167, 514, Dockets 79-4092, 79-4112PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUMBARD, Circuit Judge:

This consolidated appeal 1 from two decisions of the Tax Court, Quealy, J., arises out of the development by United States Steel Corporation (“Steel”) of newly discovered Venezuelan iron mines in the 1950’s, and the financial arrangements resulting from the creation of two Steel subsidiaries to mine and transport ore. Two distinct questions of tax law are presented: first, what kind of evidence is sufficient for a taxpayer to challenge successfully the Commissioner’s determination that payments between a parent and a subsidiary are not “arm’s length” and thus are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Charles Ilfeld Co. v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Commissioner v. First Security Bank of Utah, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Ambac Industries, Inc. (Formerly American Bosch Arma Corporation) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
  2. Eli Lilly & Company and Subsidiaries, Cross-Appellees v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and Consolidated Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  5. Seagate Technology v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API