Legal Opinion
JG Action Enterprises, Inc. v. Michael Marchky; Harley-Davidson of Siouxland, Inc. d/b/a Rooster’s Harley-Davidson
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 3, 2025No. 3:25-cv-02108Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JG ACTION ENTERPRISES, INC., Case No. 25-cv-2108-BAS-MMP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER: 13 v. (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 14 MICHAEL MARCHKY; HARLEY- UNDER RULE 12(B)(2); DAVIDSON OF SIOUXLAND, INC. 15 (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S d/b/a ROOSTER’S HARLEY- MOTION TO DISMISS 16 DAVIDSON, UNDER RULE 12(B)(5); AND 17 Defendants. (3) TERMINATING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 18 TRANSFER VENUE 19 (ECF No. 5) 20 21 Presently before the Court is Defendant Michael Marchky’s (“Defendant”) motion 22 to dismiss for lack…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Boschetto v. HansingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Panavision International, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership v. Dennis Toeppen Network Solutions, Inc., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.