Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schafer v. St. Louis & Hannibal Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1898Published

Appeal from the Montgomery Circuit Court. — Hon. E. M. Hughes, Judge.

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE BIGGS.

The opinion of the supreme court in this case decides nothing except that it acquired no jurisdiction of the cause by reason of the attempted certification of it by us. After referring to the decision of the supreme court, Judge Bland says, “in the light of this information from the supreme court naught remains for this court to do but to overrule its former opinion reported in 65 Mo. App. 201, and affirm the judgment of the lower court.” If the decision contains any “information” as to how this cause ought to be decided, I have been unable to find it. It…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morris v. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  2. Stovall v. EmersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Schafer v. St. Louis & Hannibal RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API