Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Haehn

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1957Published

1Opinion of the CourtRobert E. Noonan, J.

This is a motion made on behalf of the plaintiffs, seeking summary judgment. In the action itself only the defendants Haehn, Weinstein, Wallace, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Marine Midland Trust Company of New York, and City Bank Farmers Trust Company have answered. The defendant Jamestown, Westfield and Northwestern Railroad Company has appeared but has not answered. None of the answering defendants has responded to this motion for summary judgment except the defendants, Haehn, Wein-stein and Wallace. These defendants not only resist the motion *782made on behalf of the plaintiffs but also…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nicoll v. . the New-York and Erie Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Upington v. . CorriganNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Peterson v. . MartinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Lyon v. . HerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Vail v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API