Legal Opinion
Sears v. Automobile Carriers, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 24, 1981No. 76-40132PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEWBLATT, District Judge.
I FACTS
Defendant employers Automobile Carriers, Inc., Boutell Driveway, Inc., and Complete Auto Transit, Inc. are parties to a collective bargaining agreement called the National Automobile Transporters} Agreement. This agreement, as it is involved in the instant case, extended from September 1, 1973 to May 31, 1976.
Early in 1976, defendant employers were notified that the Local would seek a re-negotiated agreement upon termination of the 1973-76 agreement. Negotiations ensued in the spring of 1976, and on May 21, 1976, a tentative…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- William Ruzicka, Cross-Appellant v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Cross Local 166 of the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, U.A.W., Cross-Appellee. William Ruzicka v. General MotorsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Danny ReisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
3Cited by1 opinion
- Swift v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986