Legal Opinion

Strizik v. Home Indemnity Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John S. Lockman, J.

Motion by defendant for summary judgment is granted. Cross motion is denied as moot.

In this declaratory judgment action Brian Strizik seeks a judgment declaring that Home Indemnity is obligated to *13defend him in a personal injury action as an additional insured, under a policy issued to the plaintiff in that action, Richard Meyer.

In the underlying action, Strizik is alleged to have struck the plaintiff Mary Anna Meyer while parking her car for North Shore Parking, the uninsured valet service at La Veranda Restaurant.

The Home Indemnity policy excludes from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. GEN. ACC. FIRE & LIFE ASSUR. CORP. v. PiazzaNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Hiscock v. KuinlanNew York Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Underwriters Ins. v. Kum Gang Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  2. Eagle Insurance v. RosarioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API