Legal Opinion

Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. Smith

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided September 4, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDOWELL, District Judge.

This motion is based on the theory that this suit is not a suit to remove cloud from title. The first argument made in behalf of the defendants assumes that this is a transitory action, and seemingly admits that this court would have jurisdiction of the persons of the defendants, but for the (alleged) fact that federal jurisdiction is here not based solely on diversity of citizenship. The latter part of this argument, even if it were sound, is unnecessary. If this is a transitory action, the residence of the plaintiff in this district could not possibly give this…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Shaffer v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Studley v. Boylston National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Robertson v. Railroad Labor BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Devine v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Acosta v. Martín Marietta Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1997
  2. Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  3. Claudio Camacho v. Casillas MojicaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1972
  4. Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1933
  5. Appalachian Electric Power Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API