Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ingle v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 13, 2014No. CV-14-612Published

1DissentDonald L. Corbin, Justice

The question of whether the circuit court acted in excess of its authority becomes a matter of subject-matter jurisdiction and may be raised sua sponte. Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 367 Ark. 468, 241 S.W.3d 264 (2006). In our unvarying application of the rule, we have stated that subject-matter jurisdiction is always open, cannot be waived, can be questioned for the first time on appeal, and can even be raised by this court. Id. Because the circuit court did not properly have subject-matter jurisdiction of this case, I respectfully dissent.

In Ingle v. Arkansas Department of Human Services,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Priest v. PolkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Ingle v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Pro-Comp Management, Inc. v. R.K. Enterprises, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Regions Bank Trust DepartmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API