Fidelity Phoenix Fire Ins. v. Howard
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.
Appellees, Geo. R. Howard and H. G. Hawkins, were partners. Under the firm name and style, Howard Radio Shop, they conducted a radio business, and in .the same building they carried on an automobile business under the firm name and style, Forest Motor Company. Except for the fact that the two businesses were owned and operated by the same two persons as partners and in the same building, they were kept as much apart or separate as if each were owned by strangers to the other.
One Forbes was an employe of the Howard Radio Shop, with no stated duties to perform for the Forest Motor Company. On…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. TaylorMississippi Supreme Court · 1970
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CollinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
- Park v. Union Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- In Re HammonsDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1977
- Community Feed Stores, Inc. v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.