Hongyu Luo v. Tao Ceramics Corp.
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Curran, Dennis J., J.
The defendant Qian Qiao has moved to dismiss all claims for lack of personal jurisdiction under Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2).
For the reasons that follow, the defendant’s motion must be DENIED.
In determining whether the plaintiff Hongyu Luo has made a prima facie jurisdictional showing, the court draws factual allegations in the pleadings as true, and construes disputed facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party (here, the plaintiff).
Factual Background
The record reveals the following facts.
Hongyu Luo alleges that Qian Qiao contacted him in Massachusetts about…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ticketmaster-New York, Inc. v. Joseph M. AliotoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Arthur F. Sawtelle, Etc. v. George E. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.