Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Whalen
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided August 31, 2020No. 2:18-cv-00845Unknown
1Opinion
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 VIRGIL ARMSTRONG, CASE NO. C18-0845-JCC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 DEPUTY C. WHALEN et al., 13 Defendant. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ motion to stay proceedings pending 16 appeal (Dkt. No. 67). On June 5, 2020, the Court denied Defendants’ motion for summary 17 judgment, concluding that Defendants Carl Whalen, Kore Oyetuga, Chad Daugherty, and Ty 18 Trenary were not entitled to qualified immunity. (Dkt. No. 61 at 6–11.) On June 29, 2020, 19…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- City of Los Angeles v. Santa Monica BayKeeperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. John Irvin PitnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. PleasonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1928