Legal Opinion

Gaskins v. Varn

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 20, 1934No. 9575PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) After a careful study of the bill of exceptions and the briefs of counsel we find no error in the judgment. Under the usual rule applicable to the grant or refusal of interlocutory injunctions, we might forbear further elaboration or discussion of the several contentions by saying that it does not appear that in the refusal of an injunction the judge in any way abused his discretion. The plaintiffs in error rely largely upon the decision of this court in Mobley v. Marlin, 166 Ga. 820 (144 S. E. 747). We are of the opinion that the Marlin case is not in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mobley v. MarlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  2. Crapp v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  3. McCaskill v. Chattahoochee Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  4. Coffin Bros. & Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Butler v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Fulton County Department of Family & Children ServicesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Townsend v. Tattnall BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  3. Gormley v. ShiverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API