Legal Opinion

People v. Riksen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1938No. Docket No. 115, Calendar No. 39,723PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Defendant was charged with violating the hawkers and peddlers ordinance of the city of Ann Arbor. Complaint was made and filed with the justice of the peace of Ann Arbor and warrant was issued on said complaint under which the defendant was arrested. Defendant was convicted and ordered to pay a fine and costs. He appealed the conviction to the circuit court; and upon proceedings therein the defendant was held not guilty and was discharged on the ground that the ordinance was unconstitutional.

Thereafter, the people of the city of Ann Arbor made application to this court for leave to appeal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vernor v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. People v. HanrahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. City of AttallaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Devereaux v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. City of Detroit v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Newark v. PulvermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  2. Merrelli v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Village of Maywood v. HoustonIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Prawdzik v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API