Legal Opinion
Lichtenstein v. F & M National Bank of Kaufman
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 1, 1963No. 16245PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIXON, Chief Justice.
The Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Kaufman, holder of a judgment against Abe Lichtenstein, filed suit in Kaufman County against Lichtenstein and Harold A. Pollman and wife, Leah Pollman, to set aside a deed from Lichtenstein to Pollman. The Bank alleges that the conveyance was executed in order to delay, hinder and defraud Lichtenstein’s creditors. Pollman is Lichtenstein’s son-in-law.
The defendants filed pleas of privilege seeking to transfer the suit to Dallas County, their place of residence. In its controverting plea the Bank relies on Subdivisions 5, 7, 12 and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eckert v. WendelTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Thornton v. RainsTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- McGriff v. HazleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Blocker v. Commercial Nat. Bank of UvaldeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- B. F. Avery & Sons Plow Co. v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cullins v. Foster, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Hicks v. Loveless, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Burris v. McDougald, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
- Bell v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- United States v. LesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.