Legal Opinion

Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. Day

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1980No. 3092, 3135Published

1Opinion of the Court

615 P.2d 621 (1980)

STURM, RUGER & CO., INC., a Connecticut Corporation, Appellant,

v.

Michael James DAY, Appellee.

Michael James DAY, Cross-Appellant,

v.

STURM, RUGER & CO., INC., a Connecticut Corporation, Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 3092, 3135.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

August 22, 1980.

Robert L. Richmond, Richmond, Willoughby & Willard, Anchorage, and Kenneth P. Jacobus, Hughes, Thorsness, Gantz, Powell & Brundin, Anchorage, and Edward L. Lascher, Ventura, Cal. (in association), for appellant/cross-appellee.

H. Bixler Whiting, Fairbanks, for appellee/cross-appellant.

Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., CONNOR,…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Kennon v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Mary Vizzini, Administratrix of the Estate of Salvatore Vizzini, Deceased v. Ford Motor Company C/o C. T. Corp. SystemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API