Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. Day
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
615 P.2d 621 (1980)
STURM, RUGER & CO., INC., a Connecticut Corporation, Appellant,
v.
Michael James DAY, Appellee.
Michael James DAY, Cross-Appellant,
v.
STURM, RUGER & CO., INC., a Connecticut Corporation, Cross-Appellee.
Nos. 3092, 3135.
Supreme Court of Alaska.
August 22, 1980.
Robert L. Richmond, Richmond, Willoughby & Willard, Anchorage, and Kenneth P. Jacobus, Hughes, Thorsness, Gantz, Powell & Brundin, Anchorage, and Edward L. Lascher, Ventura, Cal. (in association), for appellant/cross-appellee.
H. Bixler Whiting, Fairbanks, for appellee/cross-appellant.
Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., CONNOR,…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Kennon v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Mary Vizzini, Administratrix of the Estate of Salvatore Vizzini, Deceased v. Ford Motor Company C/o C. T. Corp. SystemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.