Legal Opinion

The Elizabeth Frith

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 25, 1831No. Case No. 4,361PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BETTS, District Judge.

This case comes up on exceptions to the answer. The points raised by the exceptions are: 1. Whether an averment in the answer that proceedings were taken by the seamen before a justice of the peace, preparatory to the formal commencement of this action, prior to the expiration of ten days after the arrival of the vessel, is irrelevant. I do not propose now to enter into a discussion as to the pertinen-cy of this averment, as the point is substantially before me for adjudication in another cause. As that case may be decided upon other grounds, I am disposed to leave the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. The Mary Adelaide RandallDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API