Legal Opinion

State v. Eaves

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 5, 1990No. 232-90PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLEE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CLINTON, Judge.

The narrow question presented in this cause is whether the State is entitled to appeal an order setting aside an information upon a finding that the statute underlying the prosecution is unconstitutional. The answer depends on whether in the circumstances of this cause the order entered “dismisses” an information within the meaning of Article 44.01(a)(1), V.A.C. C.P. 1 We will hold that the order does constitute a “dismissal” such as to entitle the State to make its appeal.

I

The information charged that on or about May 6,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kemper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Robertson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. State v. Eaves, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1990
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1886
  5. Spearman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State v. FryeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. State v. RosenbaumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Miller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  4. State v. StanleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  5. Braxton v. DunnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API