Legal Opinion

Seward v. Shields

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1901No. Appeal, No. 101PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 101, Oct. T., 1901, by plaintiff, from decree of O. P. No. 2, Pbila. Co., Sept. T., 1900, No. 144, refusing a preliminary injunction in case of Thomas F. Seward v. Charles B. Shields. Bill in equity for an injunction. Error assigned was decree refusing preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from an order refusing a preliminary injunction. Before the appeal was brought to a hearing the limit of time specified in the defendant’s contract, within which he was not to solicit and receive laundry work from the plaintiff’s customers, had expired. So that whatever might be held as to the merits of the plaintiff’s bill, no injunction could now issue. Nor upon an appeal from this interlocutory decree can we make a decree for the payment of money damages upon the principle recognized in Head v. Meloney, 111 Pa. 99, and kindred cases. That could only be done on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Head v. MeloneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. McCormick v. SwaneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API