Legal Opinion

United States v. Edwin Carr

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 4, 2014No. 19-71601PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge:

I. Introduction

Edwin Carr, Damien Anderson, and Mark Franklin were each indicted on three counts related to the armed robbery of a federal credit union. A jury found all of the defendants guilty on all counts. They appeal their convictions and sentences. The government cross-appeals, arguing the district court erroneously vacated por tions of the defendants’ sentences. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 3731. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

II. Facts and Proceedings

Vons Federal Credit Union in Santa Fe Springs, California, was robbed…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Menzies v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  2. United States v. David Bruce, IICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Wolfe, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Wolfe, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Pasene v. CorreaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API