United States v. Edwin Carr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge:
I. Introduction
Edwin Carr, Damien Anderson, and Mark Franklin were each indicted on three counts related to the armed robbery of a federal credit union. A jury found all of the defendants guilty on all counts. They appeal their convictions and sentences. The government cross-appeals, arguing the district court erroneously vacated por tions of the defendants’ sentences. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 3731. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
II. Facts and Proceedings
Vons Federal Credit Union in Santa Fe Springs, California, was robbed…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Menzies v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. David Bruce, IICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Wolfe, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Wolfe, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Pasene v. CorreaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.