Legal Opinion

State of Missouri v. James Rayburn

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 2014No. ED100873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurt S. Odenwald, Presiding Judge

Introduction

Appellant James Rayburn (“Rayburn”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court convicting him of attempted forcible sodomy, Section 566.060. 1 Following a bench trial, the trial court sentenced Rayburn to seven years in prison. Rayburn now challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, alleging that there is no evidence that he took a substantial step toward completion of the offense. Rayburn contends the evidence shows that he withdrew from his plan to commit forcible sodomy on Victim, which demonstrates his lack of intent to act on his threat and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Verweire v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  2. State v. BonichMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State of Missouri v. Delmario R. ReeseMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. O'TOOLEMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Blaec James LammersSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  2. State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State v. PrinceMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State of Missouri v. Blaec James LammersSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  5. State of Missouri v. Carlton James DickersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API