Legal Opinion
Stevens v. Daigle and Hinson Rambler, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 3, 1963No. 5807PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
153 So.2d 511 (1963)
James N. STEVENS
v.
DAIGLE AND HINSON RAMBLER, INC.
No. 5807.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
May 3, 1963.
Rehearing Denied June 3, 1963.
A. J. Spedale, Baton Rouge, for appellant.
Lancaster, King & LeCorgne by Chas. D. Lancaster, New Orleans, for amicus curiae.
James A. Piper, Baton Rouge, for appellee.
Before ELLIS, LOTTINGER, HERGET, LANDRY and REID, JJ.
HERGET, Judge.
James N. Stevens instituted this redhibitory action to rescind the sale of a new 1961 Rambler automobile purchased by him from defendant, Daigle and Hinson Rambler, Incorporated. By Third Party demand…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Fisher v. City Sales and ServiceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Stracener v. Nunnally Bros. MoTor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Stevens v. Daigle & Hinson Rambler, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Route v. Smith Chevrolet Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
3Cited by12 opinions
- Media Production Consultants, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- Hebert v. Claude Y. Woolfolk CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Degeneres v. BurgessLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Berríos v. Courtesy Motors of Puerto Rico, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1964
- Lane N. Meltzer, Cross v. Roof Coatings, Inc., Defendants-Third-Party Cross Trapmar, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.