Legal Opinion

Klemann v. Collins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 23, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

From an order denying a motion made on the pleadings pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that upon its face no cause of action was stated, this appeal is taken. The order appealed from should be affirmed. The appeal is by an indorser upon a demand promissory note which, it is alleged, was duly presented for payment, although it is likewise alleged that the note was made March 1,1920, and not presented until December 15, 1925.

The defendant, appellant, urges here, as she did at Special Term, that the complaint shows upon its face that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commercial National Bank v. ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. American Trust Co. v. ManleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  3. German-American Bank v. . AtwaterNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McNee v. RingNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  2. RCA Service Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API